Le paradoxe de la tolérance disparaît si l'on considère la tolérance non pas comme une norme morale, mais comme un contrat social.Si quelqu'un ne respecte pas les termes du contrat, il n'est pas couvert par celui-ci.En d'autres termes, les intolérants ne respectent pas les règles du contrat social de tolérance mutuelle.Puisqu'ils ont enfreint les termes du contrat, ils ne sont plus couverts par le contrat et leur intolérance ne devrait pas être tolérée.
![Comic about philosopher Karl Popper's "Paradox of Tolerance," which points out that a society that tolerates intolerance ultimately loses tolerance as the tolerant are eventually destroyed by the tolerant. Therefore, defending tolerance requires <br />us to not tolerate the intolerant, so any movement that preaches intolerance & persecution must be outside of the law.](https://kolektiva.social/system/media_attachments/files/112/644/588/508/152/116/original/6924f06c53e95967.png "Comic about philosopher Karl Popper's "Paradox of Tolerance," which points out that a society that tolerates intolerance ultimately loses tolerance as the tolerant are eventually destroyed by the tolerant. Therefore, defending tolerance requires <br />us to not tolerate the intolerant, so any movement that preaches intolerance & persecution must be outside of the law.")
![The Paradox of Tolerance disappears if you look at tolerance, not as a moral standard, but as a social contract. If someone does not abide by the terms of the contract, then they are not covered by it. In other words: The intolerant are not following the <br />rules of the social contract of mutual tolerance. Since they have broken the terms of the contract, they are no longer covered by the contract, and their intolerance should NOT be tolerated. inspired by "Tolerance is not a moral precept" by <br />Yonatan Zunger](https://kolektiva.social/system/media_attachments/files/112/644/606/484/014/596/original/0098909735cc623b.jpg "The Paradox of Tolerance disappears if you look at tolerance, not as a moral standard, but as a social contract. If someone does not abide by the terms of the contract, then they are not covered by it. In other words: The intolerant are not following the <br />rules of the social contract of mutual tolerance. Since they have broken the terms of the contract, they are no longer covered by the contract, and their intolerance should NOT be tolerated. inspired by "Tolerance is not a moral precept" by <br />Yonatan Zunger")
